News

Why Does Integrity Matter?

Integrity. We admire it. We demand it in our leaders (and criticise them when they lack it). Organisations write it into their values. We aspire to it ourselves, wanting people to see us as having it. But why does integrity matter? Why all the fuss about it? What’s the basis for it? And do we need to think very carefully about some of life’s bigger questions if integrity is going to make any sort of sense?

Share

Please share this video widely with friends or family and for more Short Answers videos, visit solas-cpc.org/shortanswers/, subscribe to our YouTube channel or visit us on Twitter Instagram or Facebook.

Support

Short Answers is a viewer-supported video series: if you enjoy them, please help us continue to make them by donating to Solas. Visit our Donate page and choose “Digital Media Fund” under the Campaign/Appeal button.

God & The Value of Information

If asked whether God exists, many people will say that they do not know because there is not enough information. Give me more evidence and perhaps I will believe. One way to deal with this situation is to borrow an approach that is used in medical decision-making, known as Value of Information analysis.

Imagine you are the doctor looking after Mary, a 72-year-old lady with a cough. Her symptoms and your findings on clinical examination suggest a lung infection and the appearances on her chest x-ray support this diagnosis. But things are not entirely certain and other causes are still possible. Is there enough evidence to commit to treatment with antibiotics or should you do more tests to confirm lung infection? Doctors need to make decisions like this every day, but their choices are not based on a whim. They are made scientifically using a method known as evidence-based medicine. Much of my work as a clinical academic has involved discovering new ways to support these kinds of medical decisions. I have also found that the same principles can support faith.

By way of example, let us use Value of Information analysis to decide whether we should arrange more tests for Mary or commit to treatment based on current evidence. As we shall see, this situation is comparable to deciding whether to ask for more evidence of God’s existence or commit to God based on currently available arguments. If we had perfect information, we could give Mary antibiotics if she had a lung infection but not do so if there was no infection. In medicine, such an ideal situation happens rarely if ever. Nevertheless, we can estimate a theoretical value for having perfect information by looking at the difference between a decision made with perfect information and the best decision we can make based on currently available evidence. In Mary’s case, because antibiotics are so effective, it would be reasonable to prescribe this treatment based only on her symptoms, clinical findings, and chest x-ray. Notice that if Mary does have a lung infection, we would have made the right decision whether we had perfect information or not.

On the other hand, having perfect information would enable us to avoid giving antibiotics if Mary turns out to have something other than a lung infection. But is it worth doing extra tests to avoid unnecessary antibiotics? Probably not given the costs and additional radiation required to obtain the additional evidence. But notice that the value of perfect information is determined by what might happen if there were no infection.

The Value of Information for God’s Existence

Now let us apply the same approach to the question of God’s existence. If we decide to believe in God based on less-than-perfect evidence, we might gain the considerable benefits of correct belief, but then again, we could end up believing in God unnecessarily. On the other hand, with perfect information, we would know to believe in God if he does exist and to withhold belief if he does not exist. Because the benefits of correct belief are large, the value of perfect information for God’s existence is determined by what would happen if God does not exist. This is directly analogous to Mary’s situation where the value of perfect information is determined by what would happen if there were no infection. Perfect information would only have value if correct unbelief were more favourable than believing in God even if he does not exist. If it were the other way around, then then the expected value of perfected information will be zero or less. And if perfect information has no value, then any additional evidence for God would also be worthless.

Belief in God has inspired many things that have enriched civilisation, including works of art and music. The concept of universal human rights has its origins in Christianity. Even modern science emerged in a Christian context and many of its basic assumptions have their origins in Christian thinking. Benefits to the lives of individuals committed to God can be seen to follow from participation in public worship and other practices that aim to facilitate interactions with the reality of God. Regular attendance at public expressions of worship is associated with fewer physical and mental health problems, and a longer life span, not only in comparison to people who are socially isolated but also relative to those who are supported by secular social networks. Contemplative practices, such as focused prayer and meditation, reduce stress which, if chronic, increases susceptibility to a wide range of illnesses. An attitude of mind inspired by religious faith can also activate health-enhancing mind–body interactions.

But what about negative aspects of religious belief? Undoubtably, religion is vulnerable to being hijacked by people with violent intentions, but established scientific criteria fail to demonstrate that religious faith causes violence. Furthermore, belief in God does not in itself give license to others to hold unsubstantiated beliefs that may be harmful. Although religion can be associated with intolerance, particularly when approached as a means to an end or as a set of unquestionable beliefs that are handed down from above, belief in God does not have to be followed in those ways. This effect is not found when faith is seen as a quest for knowledge.

It is common for sceptics to base their unbelief on a lack of proof for God’s existence. When asking for more evidence, some may even think that they are being scientific. But how often do they use decision science to determine the value of the information they are asking for? If they did so, they would find that there are good reasons to think that even perfect information for God’s existence would be of no value. Therefore, before asking for more evidence of God’s existence, there is an onus on sceptics to demonstrate that correct unbelief is better than believing God even if he doesn’t exist, something they might find difficult or impossible.

About the author:
Ken Miles is a Clinical Academic and author of “From Billiard Balls to Bishops: A scientist’s introduction to Christian worship”. His website can be accessed here.

“Christianity: Irrelevant, Out of Date and Intolerant?” Outreach in Ellon

It was a joy for the Solas team to head up to Aberdeenshire to serve with Ellon Baptist Church again. Ellon Baptist had previously hosted a Confident Christianity conference, and invited us back for an outreach event. The aim of the evening was to give non-Christian folks in Ellon the opportnity to hear something about the gospel of Christ – and to help them think through some common objections to Christianity.

The evening began with a great welcome from the church community, the building was alive with conversation as tea and coffee flowed and plates were loaded up with an array of cakes and snacks. There was a good crowd present, and the church were encouraged to note that several people who do not have Christian faith had felt willing to join us for the evening.

Andy Bannister was given the topic, “Christianity: Irrelevant, Out of Date and Intolerant?” and half an hour to work through that most profound series of objections many people have to even considering the claims of Jesus, or reading the Bible for themselves. It is increasingly the case that people today are only willing to investigate the truth-claims of the Christian faith, if they are first persuaded that it is desirable. Parts of the media and secular commentary are relentless in asserting that the Christian faith falls at this hurdle. The problem with that assertion is that it rests on a whole series of assumptions which are highly questionable!

Andy delved into the concept of “Freedom”, and showed that there is little grounding for genuine human agency in atheism, with a raft of quotes from Atheist thinkers to prove the point. Freedom has two sides to it, Andy explained; Freedom From and Freedom To and these can be in tension with one another. Christian ethics, which can be misportrayed as restricting freedom actually deliver other kinds of freedoms – notably the freedom to live the kind of relationship with God for which we were designed. Andy used the illustration of marriage and parenthood. In chosing to get married, someone willingly restricts their autonomy and parenting is a massive commitment with costs in time, money and emotional ties. Yet – countless people say that the thing they are proudest of in life is what they invested in their children. What if these costs are not terrible restrictions on freedom, but a freedom to be involved in this a fundamental aspect of what it means to be human. Andy painted a compelling picture of the kind of freedom that Christ offers, and commended it to everyone. This led to a really good time of Q&A with a wide range real-world questions and examples. The Q&A got off to a slow-start, but as is so often the case, once the first question was raised the rest came in a deluge.

The pastor of Ellon Baptist Church, William Butchart was pleased with the way the evening went and wrote:

As a church we are very aware that our culture can be an intimidating one to speak about the gospel in. The ministry of Solas is so helpful in giving Christians ways of speaking about their faith. We were delighted to host Solas last year for a training evening which really benefited the church and were looking for how we could build on this with an evangelical evening that people could invite others along to.

We held this event on 14th May and it was very well attended with quite a few non Christians coming along. Andy did an amazing job highlighting how our culture promises something it cannot deliver and the questions that came following this showed a good number of people were pondering this message. Feedback has been that it has generated a lot of conversations and some seeking are watching all the material on the Solas website! Working with Solas has proven to be such a blessing to us and we hope to do so again in the future.  

We were also really inspired by the plans that Ellon Baptist Church have for their new building in the town and to see the plans. It’s exciting times for Ellon Baptist as they have moved forward with their bold plan to build an up to date facility in which to meet, worship and share the gospel.

If your church hasn’t tried a community outreach event for a while, but would like some help in putting one together, please do get in touch with Solas. It really is one of the things we love doing most – and are happy to travel all over the country to work with churches who want to reach their communities.

PEP Talk with Jason Lane

Today on PEP Talk we hear from a ministry leader helping to train, equip and release other missional leaders across Europe and Central Asia. Although his earliest experience was one of rejection and lack of support, today he has some amazing insight into what coming alongside gospel workers looks like. The lessons learned can help us no matter what our context for sharing Christ is today.

With Jason Lane PEP Talk

Our Guest

Jason Lane founded Innovista, aged 26, to equip leaders and teams to change their communities with the hope of Jesus. He holds an MDiv in Theology and Leadership from Bethel Seminary having graduated in Business Management. The practical, experiential and insightful training experiences developed by Jason and his team have been translated into ten languages and deployed in more than twenty countries. In his free time Jason enjoys windsurfing (badly) and good coffee. He lives with his wife Rachel, daughter and dog in Oxford, UK.

About PEP Talk

The Persuasive Evangelism Podcast aims to equip listeners to share their faith more effectively in a sceptical world. Each episode, Andy Bannister (Solas) and Kristi Mair (Oak Hill College) chat to a guest who has a great story, a useful resource, or some other expertise that helps equip you to talk persuasively, winsomely, and engagingly with your friends, colleagues and neighbours about Jesus.

Food for Thought in Chester

Andy Bannister from Solas, and Dave Stott from Upton Baptist Church recorded this short video from the Food for Thought event at the church, at which Andy was speaking. Dave explains the vision for evangelism the church has, and how they use these food-based events to welcome people in to hear the gospel. Andy spoke about some of the problems with atheism, and why he finds real hope in Christ, this led to many useful conversations with the many friends of the church who had come along to the event. The full story is in the video!

Can Atheists Be Good People?

Can atheists be good people? Do you need to believe in God to be good? Questions like that can cause huge arguments: but what if those are the wrong questions? Solas’s new speaker, Steve Osmond, digs into what we mean by ‘good’ and ‘bad’ and shows why if God doesn’t exist, these words are meaningless anyway.

Share

Please share this video widely with friends or family and for more Short Answers videos, visit solas-cpc.org/shortanswers/, subscribe to our YouTube channel or visit us on Twitter Instagram or Facebook.

Support

Short Answers is a viewer-supported video series: if you enjoy them, please help us continue to make them by donating to Solas. Visit our Donate page and choose “Digital Media Fund” under the Campaign/Appeal button.

Undercurrents: The Good Place

“When your time on earth is ended, we calculate the total value of your life…” 

These are the ominous words our protagonist, Eleanor, hears as she comes to terms with her untimely death in the hit Netflix show, The Good Place (2016 – 2020).  Death is not a usual conversation starter; in fact, it can often kill a joyful mood (pun intended).  For some, death is the end.  Beyond the material world there is nothing more and so when we breathe our last, that’s it.  But the popular series, The Good Place, took a comedic route to explore, not just our inevitable destination of death or what could lie beyond it, but how we determine how good our lives have been.

 The Good Place follows the story of Eleanor, who dies and goes, not to heaven, but to ‘the good place’.  As she becomes conscious in ‘the good place’ she learns why she has made it there instead of the ‘bad place’.  “During your time on earth, every one of your actions had either a positive or negative value, depending upon however much good or bad that action put into the universe. Every sandwich you ate; every time you bought a trashy magazine, every single thing you did had an effect that rippled out over time and ultimately created some amount of good or bad… When your time on earth is ended, we calculate the total value of your life… Only the people with the very highest scores, the true cream of the crop get to come here…”

These rules or criteria for access to the ‘the good place’ seem pretty straightforward.  Good deeds on earth = a good afterlife.  And yet we soon discover that Eleanor, our newly dead citizen of ‘the good place’ is actually not supposed to be there.  Why?  On earth she was a horrible, selfish person.  Suddenly the paradise and perfection of ‘the good place’ starts to fall apart, and all because Eleanor’s negative past has come back to haunt her and everyone else in ‘the good place’.

I’ll be good and not give any more of the plot away at this point.  Yet, on the surface, the value system of ‘the good place’ appears to be… well… good.  Good deeds on earth = a good afterlife.  However, several questions arise: Who decides how many points to assign for certain acts? Even in the imaginary world of The Good Place someone is deciding what’s good and what’s not.  What if person lives a wealthy life on earth so that they’re able to do seemingly more good than another person who is struggling with the cost of living crisis?  It’s one thing to assert that ‘good’ should be our eternal goal, but it’s an entirely separate issue when it comes to deciding what is ‘good’, what we mean by ‘good’ in the first place.

In a short but profound book called, Where is God in a Coronavirus World, John Lennox examines our notion of ‘good’.  He writes, “Justifiable outrage against natural or moral evil presupposes a standard of “good” that is objectively real and independent of us, so that we expect others to agree with us in condemning certain things. These standards are “transcendent”— that is, they exist above the level of individual opinions.” Lennox is showing us that we all share ideas about what is objectively good and what is objectively bad.  We’d all agree, for example, that abusing children is wrong.  This agreement that you and I have is outside of ourselves; we just know it’s wrong.  We’d be shocked if someone tried to argue in favour of such treatment of children. It’s “objectively real and independent of us”, as Lennox says.  It’s more than mere preference or opinion to know that we shouldn’t exploit children.

But how do we explain this intuition?   If we believe that there is nothing beyond death, then there is also nothing prior to life.  If we came to exist in this universe through unguided and purposeless evolutionary processes, then meaning, value and significance are things we must decide for ourselves.  We are free to make our morals up as we go along.  This freedom can often lead us to great goods, like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but as our collective history shows, sometimes this can cause great harm, such as apartheid or the holocaust.  The freedom to choose what we deem to be moral or immoral stands on shaky ground if it is indeed subjective, a matter of choice.  As the apartheid and the holocaust demonstrate, we don’t always agree upon how we ought to treat one another.  The idea of human flourishing for some has all too often meant disadvantage and oppression for others.

The Christian worldview posits that our ability to know what good and evil is actually points to God; good resides in his very character and being.  As a personal, relational being, God is the transcendent standard by which we all measure morality.  Does this mean that people who aren’t religious are without morals?  Not at all.  We don’t have to be believe in God to know objective moral values, but it seems that God (transcending shared or unshared human opinions) would need to exist in order for these objective moral values to exist.

Unlike the points system of morality in The Good Place where you earn your way into eternal bliss through good deeds, within the Christian worldview good is not a place, good is a person – good is God.  In  John’s gospel in the Bible (17:3), we’re shown that life after death is not primarily about a place but rather relationship with God: “Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.”

PEP Talk with Mark Mittelberg

When most of us think of an “evangelist”, it’s usually a heroic example like Billy Graham or else a bit of an oddball operating on the fringe of our church. We don’t see ourselves as Billy and we don’t want others to think we’re the oddballs, so we shy away from evangelism altogether. Our guest on PEP Talk today wants us to realise that different types of evangelism can match our unique personality and gifts. It’s a liberating idea that means we rely on other members of the Christian body as we support each other in reaching out with the gospel.

With Mark Mittelberg PEP Talk

Our Guests

Mark Mittelberg is a bestselling author, international speaker, and the Executive Director of the Lee Strobel Center for Evangelism and Applied Apologetics at Colorado Christian University. Mark recently released his all-new book and training course, Contagious Faith: Discover Your Natural Style for Sharing Jesus with Others He also wrote the leadership-oriented book, Becoming a Contagious Church, which presents an innovative blueprint for church-based evangelism, as well as several books on apologetics. He lives with his wife Heidi near Denver, Colorado.

About PEP Talk

The Persuasive Evangelism Podcast aims to equip listeners to share their faith more effectively in a sceptical world. Each episode, Andy Bannister (Solas) and Kristi Mair (Oak Hill College) chat to a guest who has a great story, a useful resource, or some other expertise that helps equip you to talk persuasively, winsomely, and engagingly with your friends, colleagues and neighbours about Jesus.

Frontlines EXTRA! The Filmmaker

Across all kinds of trades, professions and sectors of industry, Christians are at work. At Solas, we’ve been speaking to people who say that rather than leaving their faith in Jesus at the door when they sign-in, it is very much part of their working life. It has been inspiring to see the way in which this has affected the work people do, and led to great conversations with colleagues about Jesus. For this edition, Gavin Matthews spoke to filmmaker Phil Todd.  

GJM: Hi Phil, thanks for speaking to me today about your work and your faith. So tell us first of all something about your job, your roles and responsibilities.

Phil Todd: Hi Gavin – good to meet you! Well, I would describe myself as a filmmaker, but that word means different things to different people. My work is really divided into three categories. The first is that I am a film-editor. People hire me to come and help them shape what they have already filmed in the post-production side of things. Then the other side is that I have helped to set up a film production company called “Fellowship Film” and through that company we are developing and producing feature films and offering production services. We formed Fellowship Film in 2017 and have made two feature films so far, “The Gaelic King” a fantasy action-adventure set in Scotland in AD 800 and then more recently “Jessie and the Elf Boy”, a family comedy set in modern-day Edinburgh. Then we have also started doing some smaller stuff, like filming music videos for independent music artists; and offering post-production services to people who have maybe made a short film and need help to get it finished and packaged for festivals or whatever. I also do some consulting, giving advice to people making independent films. Then we’ve run workshops for young people to prepare them for acting on screen…. So I do a whole mixture of stuff, including a bit of acting, which I was trained in!

Producing feature films is what really excites me, but that takes a long time when you are an independent film company without the resources to do things quickly.

GJM: So producing, editing, directing and running a business as well! And of all those things, what do you enjoy the most? What’s the bit you look forward to and which gives you the most satisfaction when it’s complete?

Phil Todd: Well actually it’s editing! It was Robert Bresson who said, “You make a film three times. Once when you write it, once when you shoot it, and then once when you edit it.”  So to me that’s the most exciting time, because that’s the film that people will actually see. No one sees the script, or what was actually shot – but they will see the film that you put together in the end. So, there’s something quite exciting at that moment when you have everything filmed and you sit down to finally put it all together and create order out of chaos!

GJM: So what kind of challenges to do you face in your work? One of the things keeps coming up in this Frontlines series is the variety of different challenges people face. For one person it might be the relentless workload being placed upon them by an employer, but for a self-employed person it could be chasing the next contract and keeping the work coming in. So, what are the challenges in your work, and how does your Christian faith affect how you respond to them?

Phil Todd: Yeah, there are a number of challenges I face. One is actually just maintaining the motivation to keep going! Firstly from a business perspective it is quite hard to make a film company actually work. That’s especially the case at the moment as the whole industry is in flux. The so-called “streaming wars” between the big platforms are dominating everything, as they each seek to gain and keep subscribers. It makes it a hard environment for independent filmmakers to thrive in. So I (like a lot of artists) often come back to the basic question: ‘why am I doing this?’ This is in a context where much of society does not value creativity. It is often seen as a luxury, rather than as essential and so is the first thing to be cut in a funding crisis. So the challenge is having to be very entrepreneurial as well as creative to make the company viable. In terms of how my faith impacts that, when I look at the person of Jesus – he was amongst other things,  a great storyteller. And I find that really encouraging because as bearers of the image of God we are creative and we tell stories and make works of art. I think it is inherent in who we are. So my faith encourages me to keep going because this is part of what we have been made to do.

I also think that film has the potential to impact people in quite a powerful way and that it is important that Christians are working in this field. I think it perhaps gives us the opportunity to do something for God there, which wouldn’t otherwise happen., Traditionally the church has not engaged with the arts as it could have done and the arts have suffered as a result because they have been left without that voice of truth. So, there is a certain amount of ground to be reclaimed there. It’s important for Christians to keep going even though it is challenging at times.

GJM; So how does being a Christian affect you as a filmmaker and the choices you make? How would you be different as a filmmaker if you weren’t a Christian!?  How does your faith affect the kind of stories you tell and the way that you go about the work?

Phil Todd: Well at Fellowship Film one of our top values is “people over product”. That’s because often in the film industry the ‘product’ is seen as the ultimate thing and people are used simply as a means to an end. So it’s considered normal to step on other people to get where you want to get to, or to very quickly fire and replace anyone who isn’t getting the job exactly right. But we wanted to be a film company that wasn’t so cutthroat, where people feel valued and encouraged to do their best work. So for us it is as much about the people as it is about the film we are making. That is deliberately counter-cultural and rooted in my belief in the sanctity of human life and that everyone is worthy of respect.

In terms of the type of films I’d want to be involved in, I want to tell stories that are full of hope, light and truth. That doesn’t mean that all the films we make will be like Jessie and the Elf Boy, which was our family film. It’s colourful, bright and light-hearted – and films don’t always have to be that. Films can also be dark, but the way we’d approach that would be to face the darkness in order to bring out hope. I was inspired to want to become a filmmaker by The Lord of the Rings, and one of the things that I love about those films is that even though you have a world which is almost completely consumed by darkness, the heroes strive to bring the light and to overcome against incredible odds. I think that’s a powerful narrative – and the narrative of the Bible and indeed of the world.

GJM: You are working in a predominantly secular industry, but are known as a Christian. How do people react to that?

Phil Todd: Well it’s funny because at Fellowship Film we have decided to try and make films for the mainstream market rather than for a specifically Christian market. Ironically there is a thriving faith-based market in North America so from a business perspective we might be better off making faith-based films! Our distributor for Jessie and the Elf boy is Jewish, and he told us to put more faith-based material into our films because it will make it more attractive to that faith-based market! I’m slightly wary of that because we are making fantasy films, and there is already a supernatural element to our stories. I really don’t want to muddy the waters. In that film we have “Elf”, and to put a praying-Christian in a film alongside a fantasy character like an elf would be confusing to some people.

Generally, people aren’t surprised to find Christians working in the film industry, but they are surprised to find us working in the mainstream, not just for niche Christian markets. I have done a couple of documentary films about notable Christian figures in history, which were very much aimed at a Christian audience; so I think there is definitely a space for that. However, I am trying to be a Christian and a filmmaker rather than a “Christian-filmaker” if that makes sense!?

GJM: And that relates to what you said earlier about not surrendering the field of the arts to secular worldviews. It’s interesting that in the world of fantasy, writers like Philip Pullman bring their worldview overtly into their stories! It’s a narrative polemic that he wants to bring to bear on his audience.

Phil Todd: And I think that’s what you have to do as a creative – to be honest about who you are and what you are bringing to your art and to the viewer so they can make their own mind up. In fact having stories of both perspectives actually enables the viewer to do that. So we do need Christians bringing good stories with that perspective on the world. I think God used people like Tolkien and CS Lewis in ways that they might never have anticipated when they wrote their stories. But they have in fact opened the door for a whole range of people to engage with the Christian narrative.

GJM: And have those general worldview perspectives ever led to you having conversations about your faith more specifically? Have good stories, hope and redemptive narratives ever led on to conversations about your faith in Christ more specifically?

Phil Todd: It’s always good to meet people who love the fantasy genre and to have those kinds of discussions, there are a lot of opportunities there. The way that we have worked has definitely had an impact on people too. In fact the actress who played the lead role in our film The Gaelic King, was going through quite a lot in her life at the time we were making that film. She really appreciated the community that we formed as we created that film. She was also one of my neighbours in Edinburgh and our church was running an Alpha Course there. I invited her to that and she ended up becoming a Christian and then married my cousin – so she is part of the family now!!  It was an incredible story about how God really worked – and it wasn’t even something we set out to do in the making of the film – but He used the work as a way of reaching that person! I love it when God does something that I’m not expecting and which has eternal significance!

GJM: And have you ever had any pushback or opposition, people saying you should keep your faith totally private’?

Phil Todd:  I haven’t really encountered too much of that. I think in the arts people are quite open generally. A common assumption is that artists must be true to themselves and express who they are, so there is an openness there. Sometimes projects have stalled because we have been let down by people who didn’t share our values though – that was certainly the case with our second film.

GJM: So what motivates you to want to do things like invite people to Alpha and that kind of thing? What inspires you to speak openly about your faith in Christ?

Phil Todd: Experience – I’ve seen the difference that it has made in people’s lives when they encounter God. But I think I’m much less formulaic in the way I share my faith than I was when I was young. I used to try and move people along a conveyor belt that went Alpha-Conversion-Church Membership, whereas now I more often look to see what God is already doing and to partner with Him in drawing them to Himself – rather than trying to force a particular model on them. So, I am always on the lookout for opportunities to encourage people to meet God for themselves.

GJM: So finally  – what advice would you give to a young Christian entering the film industry?

Phil Todd: Don’t go alone, find fellowship! That has been key for me. We are called Fellowship Film after The Fellowship of the Ring, but community, and comradeship is just so important. It’s important in achieving anything in life, and its important in being a Christian too. You can’t really flourish as a Christian in isolation. We are part of the body of Christ which means that we need the other members. The Christian life is a collaborative endeavour, just like filmmaking.

GJM: Thankyou Phil – there’s lots in there! Thanks so much for talking to us.

You can find out more about Phil and Fellowship Film by clicking here.

The Gaelic King can be found here.

Click here to see Jessie and the Elf Boy

Sharing the gospel and curry! Hillbank Men’s Event

At Hillbank Church prior to COVID, we would have men’s outreach evenings around three times a year. Throughout COVID, our focus, like most churches, turned inward and the job of shepherding the flock took precedence over reaching the lost. Since then, things have very much taken off and our church has grown – meaning church maintenance has kept us all very busy. But truthfully, we have struggled to prioritise evangelistic outreach and have been eager to address this.

After Gavin preached at one of our Sunday services a few months back, we decided to press on with a men’s evening and invite him to speak. We have many in the church who are regularly engaging with non-Christian friends, family and workmates throughout the week and we wanted an occasion where they could invite these people to an informal event where they could enjoy food and hear something of the Christian message. We know events like these are central to the heart of Solas so we were really pleased Gavin could be part of the evening. Around 30 guys came along, maybe a dozen or so would have been non-Christian. Many more were invited but we’re aware that events like these won’t appeal to everyone. We enjoyed a curry together before Gavin spoke.

Gavin’s message was on point. He looked at the topic of Men of Integrity. He initially spoke about how integrity is in short supply in the public sphere, looking at examples in politics and pop culture before considering how, in reality, all of us fall short in this area. Suffice to say, everyone could in the room could relate to this. Gavin went on to share how only in the gospel of Jesus can we know true acceptance and forgiveness from God despite our failures. The message was simple, clear, relevant and very easy to listen to. No prior Bible knowledge was required which was a great help for the guys who came along.

Our hope going forward is that events like these help to serve as one step among many in our evangelistic engagement with our non-Christian friends.


Matthew Blakeman is Community Pastor at Hillbank

How Do We Know What’s True?

How do we know what’s really true? Especially when it comes to the big questions of life — like where everything came from, whether life has a meaning, and how we should live? Steve Osmond explores why when it comes to what’s true, what you believe really matters.

Share

Please share this video widely with friends or family and for more Short Answers videos, visit solas-cpc.org/shortanswers/, subscribe to our YouTube channel or visit us on Twitter Instagram or Facebook.

Support

Short Answers is a viewer-supported video series: if you enjoy them, please help us continue to make them by donating to Solas. Visit our Donate page and choose “Digital Media Fund” under the Campaign/Appeal button.

PEP Talk with Sean McDowell

This week on PEP Talk, Andy chats with US author and speaker Sean McDowell about reaching students and young people with the gospel. What themes pervade the lives of young people on both sides of the Atlantic? From science to identity to the goodness of God, Sean provides insight into how we can equip our children and young people to respond well to these questions.

With Sean McDowell PEP Talk

Our Guests

Sean McDowell is an Associate Professor in the Christian Apologetics program at Talbot School of Theology, Biola University in California. He is a speaker and author, co-author, or editor of over twenty books including Rebel’s ManifestoChasing Love, The Fate of the ApostlesSo The Next Generation Will Know (with J. Warner Wallace) and Evidence that Demands a Verdict (with Josh McDowell). Find out more at seanmcdowell.org

About PEP Talk

The Persuasive Evangelism Podcast aims to equip listeners to share their faith more effectively in a sceptical world. Each episode, Andy Bannister (Solas) and Kristi Mair (Oak Hill College) chat to a guest who has a great story, a useful resource, or some other expertise that helps equip you to talk persuasively, winsomely, and engagingly with your friends, colleagues and neighbours about Jesus.

Islam and Oslo

With family links in Scandanavia, Andy especially enjoys occasional ministry trips there. In this short video he gives an update on his recent trip to work with IFES and a Bible College in Norway. With IFES he was sharing the gospel and dialoging with Muslims, and then helping young Christians to grapple with the apologetic challenges they will face as they go to Higher Education.