When I was young, I thought faith had to be blind. I thought you couldn’t give reasons for God. I thought belief was something you simply had or you didn’t. It wasn’t until University that I became a Christian, and that was partly because, for the first time in my life, friends of mine were able to show me that their faith was not blind – that they had strong reasons for believing in God.
Now, admittedly Christianity asks us to believe some extraordinary things:
• The entire universe was created by an invisible, immaterial being.
• That being then intricately designed the universe so that human life would be possible.
• Then that being came and lived among us as a human person, he died, three days later he literally, physically rose from the grave, and then for weeks afterwards he appeared to hundreds of people.
Christianity makes some BIG claims. But here’s a phrase I want you to remember:
“CRITICISM without ALTERNATIVE is EMPTY…”
If someone wants to say your faith is stupid, you should ask them what they believe instead. You should ask them if they have a better suggestion – a better alternative – for how to make sense of the world. And then you can put the alternatives side-by-side and see which beliefs make more sense.
So that’s what I’m going to do. I’m going to give you four reasons why I believe in God, and then I’m going to place these reasons side-by-side with the alternative beliefs so that we can judge what is most reasonable.
We can see these reasons for God by looking back, looking up, looking down, and looking in.
1. Looking Back
First, let’s look back, all the way back to the beginning of the universe.
A hundred years ago most scientists assumed that the universe had no beginning – that it had just always existed. But one of the most significant developments in science in the last 100 years is that the majority of scientists have now come to believe that the universe had a beginning. Scientists are now able to detect that the universe is actually expanding in size in all directions. The picture that results from this if we trace back the expansion is a universe that began with an utterly dense point, and then, like a firework, exploded into the universe at the Big Bang.
The Cambridge physicist Stephen Hawking says this:
‘All the evidence seems to indicate, that the universe has not existed forever, but that it had a beginning, about 15 billion years ago. This is probably the most remarkable discovery of modern cosmology. Yet it is now taken for granted…’[1]
The universe had a beginning.
With more time we could look at many more reasons for God. For instance, what is the more reasonable alternative, that God is the standard of what is good and evil or that there is no such thing as good and evil?
As a Christian, I think that beginning is explained when I open my Bible and read ‘In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth’ (Genesis 1:1).
But if you don’t believe in God, what is your alternative? The alternative is to say that the universe just popped into existence from nothing, for no reason whatsoever! This is a very weird claim. Here’s one depiction of it that I saw recently:
‘ATHEISM: The belief there was once absolutely nothing. And nothing happened to the nothing until the nothing magically exploded (for no reason), creating everything and everywhere. Then a bunch of the exploded everything magically rearranged itself (for no reason whatsoever), into self-replicating bits which then turned into dinosaurs.’[2]
That’s having a bit of fun. But it’s also making a reasonable point. Things don’t just pop into existence out of nothing and for no reason. If the universe began to exist, there must be an explanation for its existence. And the best explanation on offer is that God created it.
2. Looking Up
For the second reason for God, let’s look UP. And what we find is that the universe is incredibly finely-tuned for life.
Imagine you take out a deck of cards and start playing poker with your best friend. And in the first twelve rounds, she gets twelve straight royal flushes. (If you’ve never played poker, that would be like winning the lottery twelve times in a row.) What should we think? That’s right, she’s cheating! Why? Because even if she’s a very honest woman, it’s so incredibly unlikely for someone to get twelve straight royal flushes just by chance that someone must be messing with the cards.
Over the last 35 years, the Fine-Tuning Argument has suggested that we should come to a similar conclusion with respect to God. The universe we live in could have taken many different forms, and scientists are in agreement – not just Christian scientists, but scientists in general – that there are dozens of features of the universe that needed to be precisely as they are for life to be possible…not just life on the planet Earth or life as we know it, but ANY form of life ANYWHERE in the universe.
To take just one example, the explosive force of the big bang had to be within 1 part in 10^60th of what it actually was. In other words, the percentage difference that you could have while still accommodating the possibility of life is a 0, followed by a decimal point, followed by 59 0s, followed by a 1. If the Big Bang had been even the slightest bit weaker, gravity would have made the universe collapse back in on itself almost immediately, far too quickly for any form of life to develop. If the Big Bang had been just the slightest bit stronger, particles would have dispersed into thin air. They would have dispersed so quickly and wound up so far from each other that all we could have got would have been cold, simple molecules, nothing like the sort of complex chemistry required for any embodied form of life.
That’s just ONE example, and there are dozens more.
How are we to explain this amazing ‘coincidence’? How are we to explain the royal flushes turning up hand after hand throughout the universe? We should come to the only rational conclusion:
The universe is not the result of randomness. Someone ordered the cards; someone designed the universe.
And this is just what the Bible claims:
‘For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse’ (Romans 1:20).
3. Looking Down
We’ve looked back to the beginning of the universe; we’ve looked up at the design of the universe. Now let’s look down.
And what I want you to see is an empty tomb – a tomb that’s empty because Jesus miraculously rose from the dead.
Before I was a Christian I just assumed that there was no way there could be evidence for such a thing, but when I finally looked into it, I couldn’t believe how strong the evidence was.
Richard Swinburne, one of my colleagues at Oxford University, is widely considered the best British philosopher of religion of the last generation. In his book The Resurrection of the God Incarnate, he concludes that on the historical evidence you could even argue it is 97% probable that Jesus truly and miraculously rose from the dead. Why can Swinburne claim that, and have it published by Oxford University Press? [3]
For a NUMBER of reasons, but let me focus on just one of them. Here is a passage written by the Apostle Paul in the New Testament:
For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, and then to the Twelve. After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers at the same time (most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep). Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, and last of all he appeared to me also…’ (1 Corinthians 15:3-8)
Experts have come to agree that this passage is the first known summary of Christian beliefs. Many scholars date the creed to within a couple of years of Jesus’ crucifixion, meaning that the beliefs contained within the creed must go back even further than this. Thus, almost immediately after Jesus’ execution, there were many people who were utterly convinced that they had spent time with Jesus after his death. And even the threat of torture and murder could not make them change their minds.
Pliny the Younger was a Roman governor in the first century who was persecuting Christians, and he wrote this:
‘I ask them if they are Christians, and if they admit it, I repeat the question a second and a third time, with a warning of the punishment awaiting them. If they persist, I order them to be led away for execution.’[4]
Those who walked this earth with Jesus went from mourning that their leader had been defeated and being too scared to even be present at his crucifixion, to accepting their own deaths by torture and execution rather than deny that Jesus is God. What can account for this? How could every one of them be so utterly convinced that this dead man on a cross – Jesus – was worth dying for? The Christian response is that there was a miraculous resurrection of Jesus Christ.
If someone doesn’t want to accept that explanation, what are the alternatives?
Could Jesus’ resurrection have developed as a legend over time?
No one takes this theory seriously anymore. Studies show that it takes about three generations for any significant legendary development to make its way into a text, but the passage from 1 Corinthians 15 shows that almost immediately after Jesus’ death his followers believed that he had risen from the dead and spent time with them.
Could it have been a hallucination?
No. Multiple people don’t see the same hallucination (let alone 500 people), and there were far too many appearances of Jesus in far too many places for this to be at all plausible.
Could it have been a big conspiracy, an elaborate lie?
Not a chance. People lie when they are getting something out of it. People don’t lie when they are being tortured and killed for it. The disciples saw something and it transformed their lives. What did they see? My answer is this: ‘God has provided confirmation for all by raising Jesus from the dead’ (Acts 17:11).
Have you had that moment, where faith becomes not blind but the amazing reality of what really happened?
4. Looking In
We’ve looked back to God’s creation of the universe; we’ve looked up at God’s design of the universe; we’ve looked down at the grave that Jesus rose from. Now let’s look IN.
A friend of mine once said to me, ‘Vince, do you think we can know God?’ And I said, ‘Yeah, sure.’But he wasn’t satisfied. He said, ‘NO, do you think we can really know God?’ What he was asking was, ‘Do you think we can know God personally? As a Father? As a friend? Do you think we can know not just about God, but God himself?’
There are many things in life that cannot be known from a distance. Some knowledge requires direct experience of the thing known. My wife Jo and I recently spent time in Florence, and we had the privilege of seeing Michelangelo’s famous statue of King David. We almost didn’t bother; it was pouring rain outside, there was a long queue, and we had already seen the statue countless time on postcards and documentaries.
But when we directly experienced the David—in person, up close—we were so grateful that we did. Only then did we know what all the fuss was about. We knew something by experiencing that piece of artwork firsthand that simply could not be known from a distance. I think this is also true of knowing God.
Let me tell you a story of someone I met recently who came to know God not just because of the evidence and the arguments, but because she realized that God was personally involved in the details of her life. She realized that God wanted her to give up her distance, and to live life together with him.
I was giving a talk at a University, and a Chinese girl showed up and introduced herself. One of my friends said, ‘You have an interesting name; what does it mean?’ And she said, ‘It means ‘by grace washed white as snow.’’
My friend’s eyes went wide, and he asked if she was a Christian. She said, ‘No, not at all.’ Then my friend said, ‘Do you realize that your name is basically the heart of the Christian message?’ And she had no idea. She had just chosen her English name because she liked the sound of it.
So my friend began to explain to her the Christian message – that Jesus loved her so much that he couldn’t bear to see her punished for the things she’s done wrong, and so on the cross where Jesus died, Jesus took our punishment for us, and as a result all of the bad things we’ve done are washed away; they are washed white as snow.
Then my talk started, and halfway through the talk I quoted a verse from the Bible, and I put it up on a PowerPoint slide. This was the verse:
‘Though your sins are like scarlet, they will be as white as snow’ (Isaiah 1:18).
My friend tapped the girl on the shoulder, who looked astonished, and he said, ‘I told you; that’s your name!’ At the end of the talk, my friend continued to explain to her the love that God has for her and the sacrifice that he made for her. And that night, for the first time, she decided she wanted to know God. She wanted to be in a real relationship with him. And she prayed to become a Christian.
There’s one more detail to the story that I find so amazing. My talk for that night was already written and printed a week in advance, and the PowerPoint was done. But at lunchtime of that same day I had this strong sense that something was missing from the talk, and so I rushed home after lunch and added just one additional page to the talk, and just one additional PowerPoint slide. What did that slide read?
Isaiah 1:18: ‘Though your sins are like scarlet, they will be as white as snow.’
God beautifully crafted all the details of that day so that he could reach into the heart of that one specific girl.
Do you know the God who is not just the cause and designer of the universe, but the God who will do whatever it takes to reach into your life? Do you know the God who knows absolutely everything about you, and loves you more than you could possibly imagine? Do you know the God who wants nothing more right now than to be in relationship with you?
The Christian promise is that you can really know God, in the deepest possible way – not just about God, but God Himself.
Notes
- www.hawking.org.uk/the-beginning-of-time.htm
- Widely quoted internet meme of unknown origin
- https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-resurrection-of-god-incarnate-9780199257461?cc=gb&lang=en&
- Pliny writing to Trajan, http://faculty.georgetown.edu/jod/texts/pliny.html
This article has been adapted from a talk given at the Reboot Conference.
Vince Vitale
Dr Vince Vitale was educated at Princeton University and the University of Oxford, and he taught philosophy of religion and served as a faculty member at both of these universities. During his undergraduate studies in philosophy at Princeton he took an unexpected journey from sceptic to evangelist. He then completed masters and PhD studies at Oxford, receiving a Daniel M. Sachs Graduating Scholarship and a Clarendon Scholarship.
People slept on the streets outside bookshops the night before the launch of The Testaments this September. The day of the launch was marked by a programme live-streamed to cinemas across the globe containing an interview with the author and readings from the book. This was, The Guardian told us, ‘the literary event of the year’, with hype on a Harry Potter level.
Andy Bannister led the first session of the day which was a very practical look at wise (and biblical!) ways of handing the questions that our non-Christian friends and colleagues ask us about our faith. So many Christians tell us that they would love to be better at explaining their faith in Jesus to others, but are afraid to do so. Andy encouraged the folks in Aberdeen not to let fear of failure put them off evangelism, but to discover that fear isn’t anything to be afraid of! Andy also looked at the ways that Jesus in the gospels responded to the questions people asked him – some of which were pretty hostile. Jesus’ method, and approach is something we can all learn from, and something which is liberating and empowering: and it basically involves learning to ask really good questions.
Mark Stirling lead the second session of the day, entitled “Unmasking the hidden faith commitments of our sceptical friends”. In this talk, Mark drew on both his academic work, and his experience working in the NHS to show that secularists frequently try to exclude Christian views, by trying to position themselves as ‘neutral’, but Christians are trying to impose their belief-system or agenda. Mark demonstrated that behind such claims are beliefs which are every bit as much as exclusive as ours! He suggested that exposing these hidden agendas is a good way of showing that Christians too have valid contributions to make to conversations about values, and beliefs. Later in the day Mark talked about “How to disagree without being disagreeable”. In this insightful talk which explored contemporary culture, he examined why people find Christian beliefs so offensive today (or portray Christians as hateful or harmful), and how can respond. Drawing on his own personal experiences of sharing the gospel with many people, he talked about loving and relational ways of sharing hard truths with a sceptical world.
Our third speaker, David Galloway, is a medical scientist who is convinced that universe we observe cannot be the result of blind chance alone. He is convinced that the physical evidence (as revealed by the tools of science) point powerfully to design and intention and that this in turn points us towards God. In his first talk, David explained some of his reasoning, and encouraged the folks in Aberdeen not to capitulate to the atheist claims that the claims of science nullify faith in God. Rather, he encouraged them to be confident in talking to friends, family and colleagues about the creator behind the creation. In his second talk, David explored the myths of “Scientism”, the idea that the scientific method is all that is required to understand, and explain the universe – and just as significantly teach us how we ought to act within it. Popular atheist assaults on theology and philosophy are grounded on the idea that science is the universal tool for explaining both what is and what ought to be; yet it actually fails adequately achieve either. (Our latest Short Answers video explored the same theme: “Has Science Explained Everything?” — 
Max Baker-Hytch from the Oxford Centre for Christian Apologetics (
Finally, Andy Bannister wrapped up the formal sessions with a talk entitled, “Are We Matter or We Matter?” which examined the Christian claim that humanity is valuable and precious. While our atheist friends want to reduce humans to just atoms and particles and stuff, Andy showed the beauty of the uniquely biblical claim that humanity alone both bears the image of God, and is the main object of God’s redeeming love in Christ. As such, the claim that we are merely atoms and particles, is reductionist, tragic and rather bleak. The Christian gospel’s view of the dignity of humanity, and our worth to God is a profoundly hopeful apologetic in our increasingly cynical and hope-less world.
is a London GP and Christian Medical Fellowship (CMF) Associate Head of Student Ministries. This review first appeared in the CMF Magazine, “
René Breuel’s little book, “The Paradox of Happiness” is a fascinating introduction to a hugely significant subject: human happiness. In a little over 80 short pages, he brings deeply incisive insights into the problem of unhappiness, and suggests a very distinct route out of it, into a genuine form of happiness. This is a pressing issue too, people everywhere are discussing happiness and wellbeing from 
The Paradox of Happiness by Rene Breuel is available from bookshops and 
is a speaker, author, and blogger who is passionate about equipping Christian parents to raise their kids with an understanding of how to make a case for and defend their faith in an increasingly secular world. She is the author of two apologetics books for parents: 